• Menu
  • Skip to left header navigation
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Books & Such Literary Management

A full-service literary agency that focuses on books for the Christian market.

  • Home
  • About Us
    • About Books & Such
    • Our Agents
    • Our Behind-the-Scenes Staff
    • Our Travel Schedule
  • Our Authors
    • Author News
    • Collaborators and Ghostwriters
  • Submissions
  • Resources
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Editors Select
  • Home
  • About Us
    • About Books & Such
    • Our Agents
    • Our Behind-the-Scenes Staff
    • Our Travel Schedule
  • Our Authors
    • Author News
    • Collaborators and Ghostwriters
  • Submissions
  • Resources
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Editors Select

Grammar Shrammer, It Matters More than Ever

November 23, 2012 //  by Mary Keeley//  25 Comments

Blogger: Mary Keeley

I’m taking a break this day after Thanksgiving to spend time with family, so here is an older post that bears repeating. Why? Because editorial departments at a number of publishing houses have been reduced and less time can be devoted to making your manuscript as perfect as possible.

Ruth Goring, editor at the University of Chicago Press, led a workshop at the EPA Convention (2011) on changes in The Chicago Manual of Style: 16th Edition (CMS). Why is this topic so important that an entire workshop was dedicated to it?  It may take only a few grammar, punctuation, and spelling errors in the business portion of your proposal to render it dead on arrival, that is, before an editor or agent ever reaches the manuscript. Conversely, following the latest style guidelines communicates you are a professional, committed to your craft.

The guiding force in making changes in this new edition was consistency. And several additions were made that revolve around electronic issues. With this in mind, I’m going to highlight some of the more notable changes in the 16th Edition in a simple list by their numerical address. Disclaimer: This is not a complete list; you’ll have to purchase the book or subscribe to the online version for that. But you can save the following quick list for easy reference.

CMS 16 Edition Changes

6.119      Commas following other punctuation marks are now allowed.

7.16, 17, or 18    Possessives. To maintain consistency, it was decided that possessives of all names, including names like Jesus and Moses, will end in ‘s (Jesus’s, Moses’s).

7.76     Website is now one word (website), and worldwide web is capitalized (Worldwide Web).

8.136   Rulings for styling websites. Roman for name of organization (www.booksandsuch.com); italic for title of book (www.365mostimportantbiblepassagesforwomen.com).

8.159   Ordinals and compound numbers. When the first word needs to be capitalized (as in the beginning of a sentence), both words are capitalized (First Century, One-Fourth).

8.55     When referring to a specific mountain, river, street, etc., both/all words are capitalized (Chicago River, Illinois River, Blue Ridge Mountains).

8.153   Brand names don’t need to follow standard capitalization style (ebay, iPod).

8.157   Principles of headline style capitalization. Lower-case prepositions regardless of length or importance (A River Runs through It).

Chapter 5: the grammar chapter:

5.9 (and 5.220)     Mass nouns followed by a prepositional phrase. The definite or indefinite article preceding a mass noun + prepositional phrase indicates if the mass noun or the number of the noun in the prepositional phrase controls the verb form. If a definite article (the) precedes, the mass noun controls, and usually a singular verb is used (the quantity of coins saved this year has increased.) If an indefinite article (a or an) precedes, then the number of the noun in the prepositional phrase controls (a small percentage of coins are added each month.)

14.7  Access dates. Access dates are now allowed if no publication date is available.

5.220  There is a great list of word combinations to watch out for. Example: close proximity. This is noted as redundant.

2.133  Checklist for proofing electronic publications. Also includes how to communicate those proofing changes on an electronic file.

11.2  Extended introduction to unicoding (for international characters across electronic platforms.)

15.2  Uniform treatment in author date references and notes and bibliography. CMS now recommends a uniform treatment for the main elements of citation. Use authors’ full names rather than initials. Headline style capitalization for titles or works are now identical in the author-date system.

Here are three references you might find helpful to have in your library:

  1. The Editorium. A company that sells macros.  You can purchase “File Cleaner,” which cleans up punctuation and simple grammar errors. Purchase a yearly subscription for $30.
  2. Guidelines for Author Permissions and Fair Use, Chapter 4 in the print version of CMS, 16th Edition or the online edition.
  3. Go to www.press.uchicago.edu to get Manuscript Preparation Guidelines (also includes author permission guidelines).

The CMS editors aren’t rigid about following their style. Each publishing house has its own adapted style guide, which the editors won’t expect new authors to know. But that’s a reason to follow the CMS for proposals and manuscripts because it’s a universal starting point.

Which of these items was most helpful? Most surprising?

  • Share
  • Tweet
  • Email

Category: Blog, Book Proposals, Writing CraftTag: book proposals, Chicago Manual of Style, grammar, punctuation, spelling, The Editorium

Previous Post: « Happy Thanksgiving!
Next Post: No Room for a Misstep »

Reader Interactions

Comments

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. Sarah Thomas

    November 23, 2012 at 5:17 am

    I’ve adjusted to one space after periods. I’ve gotten used to using a serial comma. But the extra “s” in the possesive is just killing me. Jesus’s? Aaaagh.

    Reply
    • Mary Keeley

      November 23, 2012 at 9:50 am

      Sarah, I agree. I have to remind myself that since I like consistency, I will eventually appreciate it.

      Reply
      • Peter DeHaan

        November 23, 2012 at 4:19 pm

        When I wrote my dissertation (at a Christian college), possessives for Jesus and Moses were stated as exceptions to this rule.

        I’m all for consistency, but “Jesus’s” and “Moses’s” looks just plane awkward to me.

    • Heather Day Gilbert

      November 23, 2012 at 5:07 pm

      Totally with you on that, Sarah. It took me awhile to get used to the one spaces. And I think “awhile” is not an acceptable one-word item yet? Well, we know it’s acceptable down South…

      Reply
      • Sarah Thomas

        November 23, 2012 at 5:20 pm

        As is my all-time favorite, “might should.”

  2. Tiana Smith

    November 23, 2012 at 6:42 am

    Woah! The possessive S at the end of names with S’s I had no idea about. It makes sense to me that they would simplify that rule, but, still …

    Reply
    • Mary Keeley

      November 23, 2012 at 10:00 am

      Yes, that one has been the hardest on my sensibilities too, Tiana.

      Reply
  3. Jenny Leo

    November 23, 2012 at 9:49 am

    I’m floored by the extra S in the possessive two. Looks excessive to me, like hissing.

    I’m glad of “website” because I’ve been doing it that way all along and don’t like being corrected/edited to the clumsy-looking “Web site.”

    Thanks for these updates, Mary. Have fun with the fam!

    Reply
    • Mary Keeley

      November 23, 2012 at 10:20 am

      Jenny, so far it’s unanimous. The extra S is infamous.

      Reply
  4. Jenny Leo

    November 23, 2012 at 9:50 am

    I mean, the possessive *TOO*. Oy.

    Reply
  5. Jennifer Major

    November 23, 2012 at 10:33 am

    The extra S’s…S-i?…will drive me INSANE.

    Maybe it’s a Canadian thing, but I’ve never heard of two spaces after a period.

    Now now, no ribbing!
    Remember, I have access to Dairy Milk chocolate.

    Reply
    • Peter DeHaan

      November 23, 2012 at 4:23 pm

      Jennifer, you might be too young.

      I learned to type on a manual typewriter more than a few years ago. The rule was always two spaces to end a sentence.

      When I decided to retrain myself for a single space, I was shocked that it only took two days to break a 40-year habit.

      Reply
      • Jennifer Major

        November 23, 2012 at 6:56 pm

        You sir, are schmoozing for chocolate!!
        I’ll have you know I’m not a day over 98. I’m not, it’s just that, I’m so not confessing my age.

  6. Rachelle M

    November 23, 2012 at 12:56 pm

    The only reason I can think of for the s’s is to simplyfy find/replace scenarios, especially when character names are changed. That way when Thomas’s shirts become Joseph’s shirts, they won’t appear as Joseph’ shirts. It must be simpler to re-train all the humans than to program the computers to understand the difference.

    Reply
  7. Becky Doughty

    November 23, 2012 at 2:04 pm

    I’m another bandwagonner on the s’s change. Wow. Question – is it going to be red-penned the old way? Does this mean that we MUST change it? Or is it acceptable either way?

    You also listed that commas are now allowed after other punctuation. Again – does that mean it’s a flexible rule? It’s allowed, but not required? Changing rules. Argh.

    But good to know.

    Blessings,
    Becky

    Reply
  8. Jenny Tavernier

    November 23, 2012 at 2:25 pm

    This was excellent!
    …Although I am late to table, reading it for the first time. The “s” will drive me nuts, but I can live. What I found validating was that I have been noticing that I had already changed my writing styles recently, re: many of the above, because they just didn’t look/read write anymore – as it proves that my osmosis utensil is still working.
    …Now if I can only remember the difference in spelling and punctuating of English English, vs. American English. (With thanks to Eats, Shoots And Leaves, for drawing my attention to why I often unconsciously incorporated both.)
    …Time to re-invest in a style update, and I give thanks for the 26 alphabet letters remaining the same…so far…lol!

    Reply
  9. Beth MacKinney

    November 23, 2012 at 3:40 pm

    This one bothered me a lot:

    8.159 Ordinals and compound numbers. When the first word needs to be capitalized (as in the beginning of a sentence), both words are capitalized (First Century, One-Fourth).

    I just don’t think I can bring myself to comply with it.

    Reply
  10. mike addington

    November 23, 2012 at 4:15 pm

    Thanks for the post, Mary. As a copy editor, I’m stunned by the change to allow a comma along with another punctuation mark. I see that in my work occasionally and always think how ridiculous it looks. Also, the lowercase initial letter of prepositions in title no matter the length makes no sense, IMO. Most non-professionals will think that a typo, mainly because they don’t know the rules in the first place. Let’s face it; there really are an enormous quantity of style rules, which, for the most part, only professionals will know. Actually, now that I think about it, even professionals don’t know or care about them, which is quite obvious by merely picking up most any book and scanning a few chapters. Comma splices are rampant. Well, you didn’t ask for an essay, did you?”,” so I close by referring to my former comments for my choice of CMS changes that seem odd.

    Reply
  11. Peter DeHaan

    November 23, 2012 at 4:25 pm

    When my son-in-law to be held his high school graduation party, he put a sign in front of his house that read “Chris’s Party.”

    His English teacher commended him for it.

    Reply
    • Sarah Thomas

      November 23, 2012 at 5:21 pm

      If it’s my birthday, I say I get to break the ‘s rule.

      Reply
  12. Gabrielle Meyer

    November 23, 2012 at 11:02 pm

    One of my beta readers pointed out the new rule on ‘s and I shuddered! As an author, I wanted to change the two names in my book that ended with an s, that way I wouldn’t have to bring myself to type s’s! 🙂 Thank you for the updates, Mary. I agree, it is a good place to start, even if each publisher has their own style.

    Reply
    • Morgan Tarpley

      November 26, 2012 at 8:46 am

      Ha. I am so with you, Gabrielle! I have two character’s names in my MS that end in “s” and I do not like having to use the “s’s” all the time. Such is life. lol

      Reply
  13. Sharyn Kopf

    November 24, 2012 at 9:11 pm

    To be honest, several of these changes annoy me and I wonder who’s making these decisions. The ‘s rule, lower casing all prepositions regardless of length, capitalizing ordinals & compound numbers when they start a sentence. And I think the only purpose of the mass noun/prep phrase rule is to add to the confusion.

    I so wish publishers would start following AP rules and forget about Chicago. Much simpler and, best of all, AP realizes the uselessness of the Oxford comma.

    Reply
  14. Larry Clayton

    November 25, 2012 at 9:34 am

    And here’s one that caught me. The First Voyage of C. Columbus is no longer the First Voyage, but the plain old first voyage. The knocking down of the iconic Discoverer, or, probably, discoverer.

    Reply
  15. Adam

    December 20, 2021 at 9:20 am

    Thank you for these tips, it was helpful even now. I recently used the service https://writemyessays.me/write-my-annotated-bibliography/ and it seems they did not know about such recommendations when they did annotated bibliography for me

    Reply

Primary Sidebar

Subscribe to the Blog

Privacy Policy

Awards

Top 50 Writing Blogs









Site Footer

Connect with Us

  • Books & Such
  • Janet Grant
  • Cynthia Ruchti
  • Rachel Kent
  • Mary DeMuth
  • Wendy Lawton
  • Barb Roose
  • Debbie Alsdorf
  • Janet Grant
  • Cynthia Ruchti
  • Rachel Kent
  • Mary DeMuth
  • Barb Roose
  • Debbie Alsdorf
  • Cynthia Ruchti
  • Wendy Lawton
  • Mary DeMuth
  • Barb Roose
  • Debbie Alsdorf
  • Debbie Alsdorf

Copyright © 2022 Books & Such Literary Management • All Rights Reserved • Privacy Policy • Site by Design by Insight